T-test

From Wikipedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Layer 1: General description and previous hypothesized conclusions

General description

Compares a continuous outcome with a normal distribution across a predictor with two (t-test) categories

Examples of Hypothesized conclusions

Layer 2: Input

Variable cluster and Research question

Dependent t-test (Paired t test)

when each member of one sample has a unique relationship with a particular member of the other sample (e.g., the same people measured before and after an intervention.This test is used when the samples are dependent; that is, when there is only one sample that has been tested twice (repeated measures) or when there are two samples that have been matched or "paired".

Independent t-test

one-sample t-test

when the population mean is equal to a specified value

two-sample t-test

Equal sample sizes, equal variance: the two sample sizes (that is, the n or number of participants of each group) are equal; it can be assumed that the two distributions have the same variance.

Unequal sample sizes, equal variance:This test is used only when it can be assumed that the two distributions have the same variance.

Unequal sample sizes, unequal variance: This test is used only when the two sample sizes are unequal and the variance is assumed to be different

Outcome

  • Distribution
    • normal
      • continuous

Predictor

  • Distribution
    • ------
      • nominal, 2 categories

Layer 3: Output

3a (1): Interpretation of the output provided by the statistician (Stata output)


Interpretation

3a (2): Interpretation of the output provided by the statistician

Image:T-test Output 3a.gif

Interpretation

There was statistically no significant difference in the age of the patients enrolled in the two groups studied.

3b : Tables published in journal articles

van Dijk GM, Veenhof C, Schellevis F, Hulsmans H, Bakker JP, Arwert H, Dekker J, Lankhorst GJ, Dekker J.Comorbidity, limitations in activities and pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Jun 26;9 (1):95

Image:Table_5.gif


Interpretation

Table 5 shows the mean differences in scores for limitations in activities and pain between patients that suffer from moderate or severe coexistent diseases (CIRS score ≥ 2) and patients that do not. Most of the moderate or severe diseases and obesity were found to be associated with limitations in activities (WOMAC, SF-36 and timed walking test) or with pain (VAS).


Abegg M, Tappeiner C, Wolf-Schnurrbusch U, Barthelmes D, Wolf S, Fleischhauer J.Treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion induced macular edema withbevacizumab. BMC Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep 29;8:18

Image:Fig_2_example_2_t_test.gif

Interpretation

The mean follow up interval was 30 ± 11 days. BCVA was 0.68 ± 0.3 and 0.5 ± 0.35 logMAR, before and after injection respectively (p < 0.01, paired t-test). CRT decreased from 454 ± 117 μm to 305 ± 129 μm (p < 0.01, paired t-test)

Layer 4: List of previous QDs

Layer 5: Annotated references